Access to Justice


Come to Victoria Town Council tomorrow evening

The Coalition for Public Legal Services (CPLS) is an organization dedicated to restoring legal aid in British Columbia. The Legal Services Society of BC has undergone two massive waves of cuts in the last year alone, including the elimination of 30 PEA positions.

CPLS consists of 18 member organizations across the province, including the Professional Employees Association, advocating for public legal services. The Coalition has embarked on a campaign to gain support from stakeholders internal and external to BC’s justice system, including various municipalities.

Over the last several weeks, CPLS members have brought issues surrounding access to justice to the attention of council members in Nanaimo, Vancouver, and Kamloops. The next city to have a similar motion presented to council is Victoria.

We invite all PEA members in the CRD to come to the Victoria City Council meeting when the motion is presented on Thursday, March 11, 2010, at 7:30PM to show your support for your fellow PEA members working for the Legal Services Society of BC. We also extend this invitation to any supporters of BC’s legal aid system. This meeting takes place at Victoria City Hall (1 Centennial Square, Victoria BC).

Feel free to contact us with any questions you may have.



Legal aid making the post-budget news
March 4, 2010, 5:06 pm
Filed under: Media, News | Tags: , , , ,

Two more stories were released about legal aid cuts in BC this week:



News Coverage: Council supports regional legal aid office

From the Kamloops Daily News:

Family lawyer Brenda Muliner got her wish Tuesday when she requested City council’s backing to keep the Kamloops regional legal aid office open.

Muliner told council five of the province’s six regional offices are slated to close soon. That would leave only the regional office in Terrace and the main one in Vancouver open.

Muliner said cuts to legal aid services have already had an impact on people who can’t afford a lawyer. Trials that would normally take two days now take four because people are unrepresented in court.

That leads to increased court costs for the legal system. And society’s most vulnerable people who cannot get help when they most need it, she said.

Coun. Nancy Bepple moved to write a letter of support stating council wants to see the Kamloops regional legal aid office kept open.

Coun. Marg Spina agreed. Having people phone for help long-distance isn’t providing a service, she said.

“Everyone’s had experiences with 1-800-who-cares?” she said.

Council voted unanimously to send the letter.



Motion to support legal aid unanimously passes in Kamloops

On Tuesday, Kamloops City Hall unanimously passed a motion to write to the Attorney General and the Premier urging them to restore and maintain funding for legal aid in BC and to urge them to allow LSS to keep the Kamloops LSS Regional Office open.

Coalition member Brenda Muliner was in attendance at the meeting.

Way to go Kamloops!



Nanaimo Legal Aid Stories
February 24, 2010, 11:09 pm
Filed under: Media, News | Tags: , , , ,

Cuts to legal aid have received considerable coverage in the Nanaimo media. Below are two stories from the Nanaimo Daily News – an editorial and a news feature:



Nanaimo City Council supports legal aid motion
February 9, 2010, 8:06 pm
Filed under: Coalition for Public Legal Services, Media, News | Tags: , , , , ,

Last night, Coalition for Public Legal Services (CPLS) member and former LSS worker Diane Brennan presented to Nanaimo City Council regarding legal aid cuts. Council unanimously supported the motion and will write letters to the province asking them to improve funding for legal aid in BC. A video of the presentation can be found online at http://bit.ly/dweTbR

CPLS member Brenda Muliner will present to Kamloops City Council next week, Feb. 16th.



Access to legal aid facing challenges
February 8, 2010, 5:02 pm
Filed under: News | Tags: , , , , , ,

From the Kelowna Capital News

The office of a non-profit organization that provided legal advice to those in Kelowna who could not afford it will soon be closed.

The closure is the closest visible sign of a wider collision between an increasing demand on legal services and a decline in the ability to pay for them.

The Legal Aid office in Kelowna is located1664 Richter St. It is one of the most recent victims to fall to budget cuts within the non-profit Legal Services Society.

Similar regional offices in Kamloops, Prince George, Victoria and Surrey along with the Justice Access Centre in Nanaimo are also on the chopping block this year.

The offices are currently scheduled to close on April 1. The cuts affect four positions in Kelowna and six in Kamloops, a mixture of staff lawyers, paralegals and administrative support staff.

The Justice Access Centre provides legal information and advice to people involved in separation and divorce.

This spring will also see the end of the civil LawLine service and the Community Advocate Support Line.

LawLine is a telephone service designed to help low-income B.C. residents who do not qualify for a legal aid lawyer.

Operators provide advice on debtor’s assistance, employment and family law, health, estate law and seniors issues, housing law and income security law-related issues.

The Community Advocate Support Line connects advocates with a lawyer who will provide legal advice, coaching and information to help them in their work on behalf of clients.

These telephone legal advice services are both scheduled to end on March 26.

Legal Services Society communications manager Brad Daisley said the society is in the process of hiring local agents.

Those agents are intended to fulfill some of the duties office staff currently do, including the provision of intake services to enable local access to legal representation, providing public legal education and information, providing legal advice, engaging in outreach and liaison activities with community, Aboriginal and legal groups and scheduling duty counsel.

Daisley noted that expressions of interest have been received from those wishing to become local agents, and will continue to be received up to Feb. 15.

According to the society’s estimated timeline, the agents would be hired, trained and start offering services byMarch 29.

Legal Services Society executive director Mark Benton noted the cuts are the by-product of the financial equivalent of a “perfect storm.”

He pointed out that as the recession began to occur, falling interest rates dropped and took with them the interest-based funding the LSS receives from trust accounts.

Benton added that two years ago, the LSS received $3 million just from the Notary Foundation, and this year the expectation from that funding source has been reduced to $200,000.

“It’s a very steep decline, and we were running a lot of our discretionary programs from that funding.”

Benton said funding from the Law Foundation takes the form of an annual grant, which the LSS continues to receive even though the foundation is currently running into deficit spending.

He pointed out the government delivers more than 90 per cent of LSS funding and continues to maintain their level of delivery.

“What we also saw as the recession started to set in was a very marked increase in the demand for legal aid.”

Benton noted rising unemployment made more people eligible for legal assistance. He added that when there is fiscal stress in the economy, that stress is reflected in domestic relationships.

Benton said the LSS has seen a 20 per cent increase in the demand for family law services.

“Our core funders, not withstanding their commitment, have been hard-pressed to maintain funding.”

Benton said a third dimension of difficulty is added by the LSS no longer being allowed to operate at a deficit, when the society had been in deficit spending for the past two years.

“Right now, we are projecting a multi-million dollar operating deficit. We need to balance that budget for next year.”

Benton said the situation spurred the LSS to look carefully at its long-term plan and put limits on the amounts of service provided.

He noted the society’s principle focus now is on maintaining services and reducing administrative costs.

Benton said these reductions have applied to a simplified billing system for lawyers hired by LSS and also to a look at how the society operates its legal aid application process.

He pointed out that moving the process to the province-wide call centre was the cheapest way for the LSS to process applications from people seeking assistance.

“They could apply either through the local agent or the phone service, but the phone service will be the predominant way.”

Benton added that the move frees up funds from administration and allows the LSS to put the money into services.

He noted the move to close regional offices and employ local agents freed up more than $1 million.

Benton said the LSS looked at the range of services provided and realized it needed to be realistic about revenue and service demand.

“Our vision of returning to the legal service model of before 2002 was not something we could realize in the future.”

Benton noted that such a return would require tens of millions of dollars from government and private sources.

He said the LSS has restricted its focus to legal aid in criminal, family, immigration and mental health matters.

Benton pointed out narrowing the focus of services provided allows the society to do the best it can with the resources it has.

He said an increasing body of social science research notes timely advice on legal problems can help avoid costs incurred on social services.

Benton added that the LSS does not believe that government and private sources will be able to financially provide those services in the current economic climate.

“I think there’s a much broader need for legal aid, but realistically we have to focus our services on where we can make a difference and where our government sets its priorities.”

Benton pointed out the LSS receives no government funding for civil law services.

He said he had no doubt that there would be exceptional service from local agents in Kelowna, but they would not match what was available from the Legal Aid office.

He added that the closure was no reflection of the calibre of the people working there.

The Kelowna law courts are the proving ground for one of the society’s pilot projects to improve the delivery of duty counsel services.

Benton noted that the pilot project involves a single duty counsel lawyer dealing exclusively with minor criminal offenses such as breaches of probation or failures to appear in court.

He noted this is one of the areas where the LSS had limited service in criminal law due to budget constraints.

Benton pointed out that national statistics show such minor offenses as the fastest growing area of criminal offense, with a similar trend reflected in B.C.

He said the final report on whether having a dedicated duty counsel for such offences is more effective.

He noted costs are not reduced, but it may be a more efficient way to operate and enhance the level of duty counsel available.

“We obviously believe this helps the court as well.”

B.C. Ministry of Attorney General public relations officer David Townsend said the decision to make the cuts was an internal one, made by the Legal Services Society.

He noted that the LSS does receive government funding from the ministry, but that funding has not been cut.

The NDP’s critic for the attorney general ministry, MLA Leonard Krog, said it is typical for the government to pretend they have no responsibility for anything they fund.

He pointed out that the bulk of the budget for the LSS is provided by the ministry of the attorney general.

“The money that comes from the Law Foundation and the Notary Foundation is drying up, but the mandate to deliver legal aid is still the government’s responsibility,” he said.

Krog added that the current Liberal government had already cut the legal aid budget by more than 40 per cent after being elected.

He also doubted whether replacement services instituted by the LSS would be able to fill the gap.

“I don’t think it’s going to be a cost-effective service, and the lawyers going on strike in Kamloops tells you what the legal community thinks of it.”

A group of Kamloops lawyers withdrew all family and criminal court duty counsel work beginning Jan. 11 in protest of the cuts.

Krog noted the seven per cent legal services tax brings in more than enough money to fund Legal Aid, but he said portions of the tax are diverted into general government revenue.

“The fact is that we’ve starved the legal aid system around the province.”

While access points to legal assistance are being reduced, the demand for those services continues to increase.

Elizabeth Fry Society agency coordinator Aimee Thompson said the closures will affect the amount of legal assistance available to the society’s clients.

The Elizabeth Fry Society is a non-profit organization that works primarily with women involved in the justice system.

The organization also operates a sexual assault counselling centre and works with women who become involved in all forms of violent situations.

Thompson said Elizabeth Fry staff have found that when women are at the contemplation stage of leaving a violent domestic situation, they want to find out what their rights are or ask for more information about family law.

She said a number of the women are referred to Legal Aid or to the Lawline telephone service.

Thompson noted that staff also use the Community Advocate line to get more specific legal information or to get advice from a lawyer.

“There are alternatives, but they’re not going to be funded and have the same kind of mandate that Legal Aid had,” she said.

Thompson noted that the EFS has contacted several other legal organizations in an attempt to find alternate sources, but pointed out that access to Legal Aid and the Lawline telephone service has helped streamline a legal process that people often find confusing and frustrating.

She said the LSS previously saw resources cut in 2002 and thought services would be rebuilt from there, rather than suffering further rounds of cuts.

“My sense is that we are going through a phase of much more deprivation and punishment.”

She noted there is a reliance on the criminal justice system to provide counselling and assistance after people have gone through it.

“I think we should all be concerned that our most vulnerable citizens are being scooped up by the criminal justice system and criminalized before they have access to social and justice services.”

Thompson said the effects of the work of local agents being hired as replacements will depend on the individuals hired.

She noted that a Legal Aid outreach worker currently attends a local committee to create change for women experiencing violence.

Thompson pointed out one of the valuable pieces of work performed by LSS employees is delivering direct information to citizens and being part of community efforts.

She said the local agent may see the community contact as valuable and provide time for their staff to do that work, or may decide it is not something mandated within their contract with LSS.

Thompson’s hope is that the LSS will select someone who would like to maintain current services.

“We kind of have to have faith that the Legal Services Society will continue to meet its mandate.”

Still, Thompson added that the LSS would be doing so with decreasing resources and an increased demand on its services.

For advocates working for the Elizabeth Fry Society, the Legal Aid office and telephone service closures will mean more time needed to acquire basic legal information.

“We do provide that information, but we can’t do it all.”

Thompson has been with Elizabeth Fry for eight years and has seen the increasing demand on legal services.

She noted that new client request intakes have more than doubled in the past year.

Thompson added that the numbers of women being charged in domestic violence situations have also increased, as have the general numbers of incarcerations.

She pointed out that with less access to legal aid, more people are pleading guilty than would have if they had professional assistance.

The ramifications of the guilty plea in a domestic violence situation continue beyond the initial sentence.

Thompson pointed out that any record of domestic violence will affect that individual’s future, including the custody of their children if they have any and the degree of their further involvement in the family law system.

“You end up having a person in a very stressful situation, getting snared in these processes.”

Thompson noted that some of these situations could be resolved by not charging people in the first place but getting them the help they need and making their rights known to them early on.

“I think Legal Aid has tried to do that, along with others.”

She pointed out the cuts ultimately increase the burden on remaining providers, a burden that cannot help but increase when staff that deliver a service are removed.

Thompson noted the provision of legal aid is necessary.

“These are people’s rights, these are Charter rights that people have access to. We want people to have participatory access to the justice system if they need it.”

Kelowna Women’s Resource Centre coordinator Micki Smith also expressed concern about the closures.

Smith noted many of the services the regional office provided will no longer necessarily be available.

She pointed out the streamlining of the application process may shut out applicants who would only be eligible for legal assistance on closer examination of their situations.

“There are a number of situations where on the surface it might appear that someone might not be eligible for legal aid.”

Smith added that if more time is required to determine someone’s eligibility, she was concerned about those people having access to legal assistance.

She pointed out that a person could be on a criminal charge but may not necessarily be eligible for legal assistance if it does not appear they would receive a jail sentence.

Smith gave the example of a woman with a severe mental impairment who was told she would not be covered by legal assistance because she would not receive jail time.

Smith noted the woman would still garner a criminal record. She added that the woman was fortunate enough that a staff lawyer from LSS was available during the time when she showed up to court, but gaining that assistance was a matter of luck and good timing.

“It’s concerning that people are not going to have that.”

Smith noted that community advocates do not have the legal expertise to fill in the gaps.

She pointed out that local advocates are inundated with cases, despite their lack of formal legal training.

“It’s going to be really challenging. As advocates in the community, we need to have access to legal help as well.”

Smith noted that legal services have been denigrated since the mid-1990s, making it harder for people to ensure their rights are protected.

She said people should have access to good legal counsel but she anticipates that more people will have to represent themselves in court.

“I anticipate judges are not going to be happy. The court systems are already backed up, I can’t imagine how much more it’s going to be backed up if people have to represent themselves.”



Legal aid motion passed at Vancouver city council
February 4, 2010, 5:11 pm
Filed under: Media, News | Tags: , , ,

Councillor Ellen Woodsworth brought forward a motion in support of legal aid in BC that was approved at this week’s meeting.

To view the entire motion being presented and discussed at Vancouver City Council on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, click on http://cityofvan-as1.insinc.com/ibc/mp/md/open/c/317/1198/201002021345wv150en,013 (note, you will need Windows Media Player to view the file).



Province fears legal-aid ruling sets ‘dangerous precedent’
February 1, 2010, 9:52 pm
Filed under: News | Tags: , , ,

From the Vancouver Sun: (Good history of legal aid in BC)

A ruling by the B.C. Supreme Court could set “a dangerous precedent, opening the floodgates” on legal aid spending by ordering Victoria to provide a lawyer to a family that earns too much, the provincial government fears.

Justice Elaine Adair last week confirmed the order that Victoria must provide the lawyer to two parents fighting to get their two kids back from the Ministry of Children and Family Development.

After a Sept. 15 ruling by Provincial Court Judge Kenneth Skilnick, a lawyer was provided to the family, who are known only by initials in court documents,

The attorney-general’s office appealed that decision, saying Skilnick expanded the definition of “indigency” and overly relaxed the financial eligibility requirements for state-funded legal help.

But the decision is really only the latest sign of a looming showdown between the government and the judiciary about what support the Constitution requires for the poor who find themselves dealing with the legal system.

B.C. lawyers have called for a full review of legal aid, which has lurched from crisis to crisis over the past decade of Liberal administration primarily because the government savagely slashed the plan’s budget on assuming office. The system has been trying to right itself since.

“The more comprehensive legal aid system which we once knew in this province is no longer recognizable as such,” James Bond, president of the Canadian Bar Association B.C. Branch, recently said. “The volatility of its funding model has led to unrealistic limitations on who can access legal services for what needs, and increased reliance on ’self-help’ materials for people who have to go to court unrepresented.”

Frustration is evident across the province both in the protests by community and legal groups and the withdrawal of legal aid services by some lawyers in Kamloops.

In this case, the family relied on a Supreme Court of Canada decision that declared continuing custody orders a threat to the constitutional rights of parents.

The court in that New Brunswick case spoke about a duty on government to provide counsel for “indigent persons” but it did not elaborate on who was indigent.

The attorney-general’s office in this case said Judge Skilnick decided that question incorrectly and he was wrong to conclude the parents were indigent.

Justice Adair disagreed.

The children were apprehended in 2008, have been in custody ever since and the government now does not want to return them.

The parents were refused legal aid because their income exceeded the financial eligibility guidelines.

They say they have a net family income of $3,518 per month and expenses of $3,390. The cutoff for a family of four is a net income of $3,050; for a family of two it is $1,950.

The government maintained the couple were a family of two because the children weren’t with them. And, it showed some flexibility by offering to pay for a lawyer if the parents contributed.

The parents said they had no extra money to do that and asked the court for help.

Justice Adair noted that Victoria’s detailed 34-page written argument and a two-volume brief containing almost 50 authorities (cases, legislation and secondary sources) “reflects the dangers [the government] perceives in the prospect that Judge Skilnick’s decision will be followed, with the potential result that a more relaxed test of financial eligibility will begin to be applied . . . .”

She acknowledged its warning that such a ruling could create a precedent and open the floodgates.

But she didn’t buy the argument and upheld Judge Skilnick’s order.

In all of this, the kids have languished in care — it’s taken a year of squabbling over the family’s ability to pay for a lawyer before anything else could be resolved.

A hearing on the real issues is not set to begin until September and continue in November.



Ontario lawyers end legal aid boycott
January 25, 2010, 4:59 pm
Filed under: News | Tags: , , , ,

From CBC.ca:

A last-minute deal has ended a legal aid boycott in Ontario after the government promised additional funding for the cash-strapped system to keep the dispute from escalating.

The seven-year deal is estimated to provide at least an additional $80 million for the legal aid budget and make up about 75 per cent of the losses those lawyers have suffered amid cuts over the last 20 years, sources told The Canadian Press.

That would bring the budget for legal aid to at least $280 million from the current $200 million.

While the government wouldn’t specify how much additional money could be on the table, it said there would be “unspecified funding” as needed for the additional three years.

But it said it was too early to tell what, if any, more funding may be required.

“We’re very pleased that in a difficult economic time the government committed itself to long-term funding to compensate the service providers, which in turn will increase the availability of quality legal services for defendants and others who can’t afford to hire lawyers,” said Frank Addario, a past president of the Criminal Lawyers Association who spearheaded the boycott.

“This is the longest, largest commitment to legal aid funding that the government has ever made, and I’m very happy that Ontario has grasped the importance of funding this social program and its relationship to the quality of justice in Ontario.”

Attorney General Chris Bentley had initially responded to the boycott by promising a $60 million boost to the program’s annual budget.

That, Bentley said at the time, was the government’s final offer as the province faced a $24.7 billion deficit.

Sunday’s deal amounts to a 40 per cent hike over seven years.

The agreement also increases rates for major cases and eliminates a 25 per cent reduction for fees paid to junior lawyers on those cases, while creating a dedicated Legal Aid Ontario fund to increase the fees available for defence experts.

The Attorney General’s office and Legal Aid have also agreed to sit down with the CLA by April 1, 2015 to discuss the future of the program.

At the end of the day, this is one of those where everybody can walk away proud and confident that they’ve made an important contribution to justice in Ontario,” Bentley said in an interview.

“We have committed to the criminal lawyers and to the other legal organizations that we will [provide] funds if there’s additional need for funds.”

Bentley said the agreement stemmed from very productive discussions” with various legal groups that were set up after the government’s initial investment announcement.

Criminal lawyers are expected to begin accepting legal aid certificates within the next day or two, and according to Bentley, the hard-fought battle hasn’t created any bad blood.

“Whatever was happening out there, the private discussions, very productive, very respectful,” Bentley said.

The CLA contributed greatly, I’m really looking forward to an ever-strengthened relationship.”

Addario credited his membership for taking such a long-standing stance on the issue to ensure much-needed changes took place.

“I’m very proud of my membership because they stood up for a principle and they said, at the risk of making a lot of people unhappy, at the risk of passing on cases that we want to do, we are going to make this point and we are going to expose the shortcomings of the system to the public,” he said.

More than 1,000 defence lawyers took part in the boycott, which began in June, as anger grew over the gap between what they are paid through legal aid and what provincial prosecutors earn.

A former Superior Court justice, the province’s Crown attorneys and The Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted all joined the protest, warning that ongoing neglect would do irreversible damage to the justice system.

The boycott targeted only homicide cases and gangs and guns cases, but there were several threats to expand the protest.

The CLA ultimately agreed to give the government 60 days to negotiate an deal, threatening an expansion Monday if a deal wasn’t reached before then.

More than 100 people in Ontario who have needed a lawyer paid at legal aid rates have been unable to get one because of the job action.